Hi Engin,

Firstly, I would like to sincerely apologize for the delayed response as we have been experiencing an unusually high number of tickets. I am sorry that it has taken longer than usual to respond to your concern and your patience is highly appreciated.

-

I am honestly not 100% sure if that will be possible. We are checking with our developers, and going to advise you as soon as they confirm it.

Thank you for your patience.

Hi Engin,

Just following up to let you know i am still checking with our developers about this.

It seems that we will not have a working solution at the moment that could allow having the Filters above the Table and duplicated Filters below the Table as well, but still working to try and find any kind of a workaround.

We will report back again when our further testing and search for workarounds is completed.

Thank you again for your patience.

Hi Engin,

Apologies for all the waiting time again.

We have confirmation after a lot of testing.

At this time, we don't have any built-in solution to achieve this, but you can suggest it to our developers - they will do their best to make a solution in the future.

Please feel free to search on our suggestions page, 

 to see if someone may be already suggested this feature. If you can't see it, feel free to add your suggestion there,  and as more people vote, the feature will move higher on the priority list.

You can certainly follow our changeLog page if you'd like ( it is also available in the plugin dashboard), where we state any changes/new features/bug fixes during updates;

and our newsletter, so you're informed about new features, bug fixes, freebies, etc.

-

If you have coding skills and wish to try to make a custom solution now,

you can check out our available hooks for Developers on this documentation and see if you can find any hook that might help.

Please be advised that custom solutions with hooks are not included in our support.

You can also research resources such as Stack Overflow to see if any other user perhaps found a workaround.

( We do like to give examples for certain solutions, but for this use-case, we, unfortunately, don't have anything yet)